Tuesday, November 20, 2007


Market Trends
Turning the Bad Press around by listening to the professionals!
“Economy in Focus”. Lawrence Yun, NAR VP interviewed by Robert Freedman of Realtor Magazine, November 2007.
• Prediction of existing home sales down 7% for 2007. BUT, after a 5 year high, leveling to normal figures of
2002 is happening (and that was a “very good year”).
• Analysts use county records and mortgage data from the secondary market, lagging in information. Real Estate
professionals use the MLS data which is “timely and more representative of market” (3rd quarter of 2007 is
showing “positive price growth”).
• Foreclosures may rise in 2008 because of “teaser rates”, but that market is “less than 1% of the market”. (New
Mexico foreclosure rate has decreased 9%).
• The challenge is the psychology beyond the headlines: inventories are flush, prices are moderating, interest
rates remain historically low. It is a very good time to buy.
• Loans? If you are a good risk, credit will be there. Can’t qualify for prime loans, options still are available. FHA
reforms are being backed by NAR.
“The Market’s (stock) Mixed Message”. US News & World Report, 11/12/07.
“The economy did turn in its best back-to-back quarters in four years, booming 3.9% in the July – September
quarter.” …”better than expected report from the Labor Dept that the economy added 166,000 new jobs in
October, twice as many as predicted”. “Growth to dip to +2% this quarter before rebounding to around
+3% next year as the housing market becomes less of a drag”.
Commentary: Spread between Treasurys, mortgages raises concern
Friday, November 16, 2007
By Lou Barnes Inman News

In one of life's larger mixed blessings, a return of financial panic is pushing mortgage rates lower. The approach to 6 percent is taking longer than I thought, but the week's events make crossover to the fives more likely than ever.
Signs of slowdown are accumulating: Retail sales in October rose a meager 0.2 percent; new claims for unemployment insurance are now rising (slowly, but rising), and October industrial production slipped by 0.5 percent.
Half of the commentariat still insists that inflation is the real trouble, the economy is fine, and the credit markets will soon self-correct. Two Fed governors also made these points today (Poole and Kroszner). This flight to quality -- 10-year Treasurys down to 4.14 percent this morning -- has nothing to do with expectations of an easy Fed. At this point, the queasy sensation of a Fed out of touch with reality adds to the panic.
The stock and bond markets this week were overwhelmed by blown deals, probable bankruptcies, more write-downs pending, and cash running to safety. Even "safe" positions in commodities began to fail, gold in free-fall: this Crunch is deflationary.
Instead of a recitation of institutions and their woes, here is an example, a story to describe the peculiar nature of this Crunch and its consequences: the oddly wide spread between the 10-year T-note and mortgages.
Under normal historical circumstances, the 10-year should lead retail mortgage rates on a leash no longer than 1.5 percent to 1.75 percent. We've taught a generation of borrowers that wherever the 10-year goes, mortgages are sure to follow.
Since the onset of the Crunch in August, frightened money has gone to the 10-year, but mortgage rates have been sticky. For the last couple of weeks, the 10-year has been at 4.25 percent, and the retail rate for the lowest-fee 30-year mortgages has been stuck at 6.375 percent. A spread wider than 2 percent! Why?
Mortgages are toxic, but given Fannie's and Freddie's federal "Agency" credit and too-big-to-fail status, who should care? Almost all the Treasury/mortgage spread is compensation for the risk that you'll refinance -- nothing new there. And, if credit were the issue, Ginnies' yield would be falling versus F&F; Ginnies are by statute "full faith and credit," the same credit as Treasurys. The Ginnie/F&F spread is stable.
I posed the question to a kid running a trading desk (in his 20s, already a Master of the Universe). "There's too much production for demand." Son, don't fib to an oldster: The production of mortgage-backed securities has crashed by two-thirds since August. "So? I said there was too much production for demand."
By what mechanism in the midst of a flight to quality would investor demand fall faster than collapsing production? In all recent recessions, consumer demand evaporated and the Fed restored it by injecting liquidity. This predicament is unique (since the 1930s ... heh-heh...): Capital is evaporating, and the capital is leveraged. Lose 10 percent of a stock market mutual fund and you've lost 10 percent of your money; if a bank loses 10 percent of its assets, it has lost everything -- all of its capital.
The Fed can't create capital. Only earnings over time, or sale of new stock, or raising subordinated debt can do that. If you're losing money, new capital doesn't want to join your busted party. To raise $2 billion in capital from BofA, Countrywide had to give an option on 17 percent ownership and pay 7.5 percent interest. Even on rich terms, capital injection is risky: BofA's option is at $17, but Countrywide stock hit $12 this week.
If you are a bank or dealer with impaired capital, you can't make new investments and may have to shed some that you have. Giant banks and dealers alone wrote off $50 billion in capital in the third quarter, and face a like amount in the fourth, more following. At 12:1 leverage, conservative for guaranteed-credit assets, that's enough capital to have supported $1.2 trillion in Agency mortgage-backed securities.
That's where demand went, and is still going. Fast. Nevertheless, panic is pulling Treasurys down enough that even at a wide spread, mortgages are going lower.
Lou Barnes is a mortgage broker and nationally syndicated columnist based in Boulder, Colo. He can be reached at lbarnes@boulderwest.com.

Wednesday, November 07, 2007


Overnight real estate rates rise again
30-year fixed rate at 5.96%; 10-year Treasury yield at 4.37%

Inman News
Long-term mortgage interest rates continued higher Tuesday, and the benchmark 10-year Treasury bond yield rose to 4.37 percent.
The 30-year fixed-rate average inched up to 5.96 percent, and the 15-year fixed rate gained to 5.57 percent. The 1-year adjustable, however, slipped to 5.63 percent.
The 30-year Treasury bond yield gained to 4.67 percent.
Rates and bonds are current as of 7:15 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
Mortgage rate figures are according to Bankrate.com, which publishes nightly averages based on its survey of 4,000 banks in 50 states. Points on these mortgages range from zero to 3.5.
In other economic news, the Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed 117.54 points, or 0.87 percent, finishing at 13,660.94. The Nasdaq jumped 30 points, or 1.07 percent, closing at 2,825.18.
Stock figures are current as of 7:30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Investment group calls for removal of CEO



Inman News


Embattled builder Beazer Homes USA Inc., which is facing a series of investigations and lawsuits over business practices and plans to restate earnings dating back to the 2004 fiscal year, announced that it cut a quarter of its workforce, or 650 positions, in October.

Also, an investment group affiliated with a coalition of unions is calling for the removal of Beazer Homes CEO Ian McCarthy.

CtW Investment Group charges in a scathing letter to the chairman of Beazer's nominating and corporate governance committee, "Taken together, the combination of improper practices, compliance failures and poor corporate governance … constitute a stinging indictment of Beazer's leadership in general and of Mr. McCarthy in particular. By swiftly replacing Mr. McCarthy with a qualified CEO and naming an independent director to assume Mr. Beazer's role as chairman, the board can begin to restore the credibility Beazer desperately needs."

The letter also states, "Rather than create sustainable, long-term value for shareholders, Mr. McCarthy has garnered egregious compensation while allowing his management team to violate federal law, improperly account for land development costs and sale-leaseback transactions, and provide undisclosed loans to executives."

A Beazer spokesperson was not immediately available for comment about this letter, issued today. CtW Investment group works with pension funds sponsored by affiliates of a coalition of unions that represents about 6 million members. CtW has also called for the resignation of Countrywide Chairman and CEO Angelo Mozilo.

Beazer in October announced plans to restate earnings, and said an internal investigation revealed that employees of the company's mortgage corporation "violated certain U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development regulations."

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and U.S. Attorney's Office are investigating Beazer's business practices, and several lawsuits have been filed by shareholders.

The company announced today that it is not able to report its earnings results for the fourth quarter of the fiscal year and the full year because of the pending restatements of past financial results.

The company expects results for the fourth quarter to include noncash pretax charges to abandon land option contracts, recognize inventory impairments, and to record impairments and land option abandonments in joint ventures of about $230 million.

"The company is working expeditiously to complete the restatements and report audited financial results for the quarter and year ended September 30, 2007 as soon as possible," according to the announcement.

The company's net new-home orders totaled 973 for the quarter ended Sept. 30, a 53 percent decline compared to the same quarter last year, "driven largely by an unusually high cancellation rate" of 68 percent, which he company attributes, in part, "to the pronounced tightening in the mortgage markets in August and September."

"The housing industry continues to face the most difficult business conditions in over a decade," McCarthy said in a statement.

"We must continue to adapt to the realities of the current market by remaining disciplined in our operating approach and continuing to focus on initiatives aimed at responding to what we believe will continue to be a challenging environment in the near term. These initiatives include reductions in direct costs, overhead expenses and land spending, and an intense focus on sales and marketing efforts to reduce unsold home inventories, all with the aim of generating cash."

The company announced that its workforce reached a peak level in March 2006, and since then the overall company headcount has dropped by about 50 percent "through reductions in force and attrition."

"The company expects these most recent headcount reductions to result in annualized cost savings of at least $30 million. In addition, the company has reorganized accounting and back-office functions and is centralizing a number of marketing initiatives to achieve additional efficiencies," according to the announcement.

"With recent industry data suggesting that market conditions may deteriorate further before a recovery is under way, we need to adapt and further align our cost structure and investment levels to expected lower volumes. While these decisions are not taken lightly, they are necessary in order to maintain our sound financial position," McCarthy said in a statement.

The company's board of directors voted to suspend a quarterly dividend of 10 cents per share, concluding that the action would allow the company to conserve an estimated $16 million of cash on an annual basis and "is prudent in light of the continued deterioration in the housing market," according to the announcement.

Beazer, headquartered in Atlanta, has operations in Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and West Virginia, and also provides mortgage origination and title services to home buyers.

***

Send tips or a Letter to the Editor to glenn@inman.com, or call (510) 658-9252, ext. 137.

Copyright 2007 Inman News

Top
Florida's condo craze


Florida's condo market, where investors and speculators were active during the boom, illustrates how condos and condo conversions may affect rental markets.

According to Marcus & Millichap, the five markets that saw the greatest percentage of apartment units converted from apartments to condos during the housing boom are all in Florida.

Nearly one in three apartments in Ft. Lauderdale -- an estimated 28,800 units -- were converted to condos. The pace of condo conversions was also impressive in Orlando (24.2 percent of apartments converted); Palm Beach (23.7 percent); Miami (20.7 percent); and Tampa (15.6 percent).

Other cities on Marcus & Millichap's list of top 10 condo conversion markets include Charleston, S.C. (15.3 percent converted); Jacksonville, Fla. (11.6 percent); Las Vegas (11.6 percent); Phoenix (9.6 percent); and San Diego (7.8 percent).

While apartment vacancy rates fell precipitously in the top 10 condo conversion markets from 2003 to 2006, the trend has since reversed itself in each of those markets.

If a 5 percent vacancy rate represents a balance of the needs of property owners and renters, the apartment vacancy rate in mid-2006 favored renters in just two of the top 10 condo conversion markets -- Charleston and Phoenix.

By the end of the second quarter of 2007, vacancy rates exceeded 5 percent in six out of 10 of those markets, putting renters in the driver's seat in Orlando, Palm Beach, Tampa and Jacksonville. In just 12 months, Marcus & Millichap reports, the vacancy rate in Palm Beach shot up from 4.2 percent to 7 percent.

Ron Witten, a consultant who advises developers, investors and lenders on major U.S. apartment markets, said rents are generally tied to the housing inventories. In some markets, for-sale homes may be so abundant -- and attractively priced -- that they attract buyers who might otherwise have been renters.

"The number one factor (on rents) is how overbuilt the overall housing market is in each of these metro areas," Witten said.

In markets like Austin, Texas and Raleigh, N.C. -- where there's no evidence of an oversupply of single-family homes or condos -- the subprime fallout will turn many families into renters, Witten said. While other apartment owners will move up to home ownership, "there's no dilution of demand. It's a swap -- some move from A to B, while others move from B to A."

But in areas where developers built lots of new homes and condos during the boom, oversupply has the potential to depress rents, Witten said. Compounding the problem, many areas that saw a boom in construction were also popular with speculators who bought properties that are now or soon will be back on the for-sale or rental markets.

According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, 32 percent of home loans in default in the state of Nevada at the end of June were to borrowers who didn't occupy the property in question (see Inman News story). In other words, they were second homes or properties bought to flip. The non-occupied share of loans in default was also much higher than the national average of 13 percent in Arizona (26 percent), Florida (25 percent), and California (21 percent).

Trosien said those areas -- and also places like Chicago and Washington, D.C. -- are examples of ghost markets, where owners of rental properties are "competing against not only professionally managed developments, but people who went in and bought to flip."

The latest Census Bureau numbers show rental vacancy rates are highest in the South (12.1 percent) and Midwest (11.6 percent), and lowest in the West (6.8 percent) and Northeast (7.1 percent).

Marcus & Millichap and Economy.com estimate that so far this year, condo sales have plummeted 55.5 percent in the Washington, D.C., area, 40.2 percent in Las Vegas and 25.6 percent in Phoenix. Condo sales have also slowed in the Florida cities that led the nation in condo conversions, including Tampa-St. Petersburg (down 34 percent); Jacksonville (down 28.6 percent); and Miami (down 28 percent).

Although most of RealFacts' clients own, manage or develop multifamily housing projects, Latham said the firm has been retained to do studies for developers who have San Francisco Bay Area condominium projects in the works. Developers are anxious about whether there will be buyers, and if so whether the buyers will be able to get loans.

"People have been coming to us and saying, 'What would we get if we turned this into a rental project?' " Latham said.

Like Latham, Witten expects to see existing buildings subjected to condo conversion coming back as rentals, and new projects originally conceived as condos marketed as apartments instead.

"It's much easier to speculate in condos than it is in the single-family market. I can put a deposit down on a new condo, and if it's a presale I don't have to worry for 18 months if I have to close," Witten said. "I think we ended up getting a lot of condo construction supported by those speculators that, in hindsight, was in excess of what was needed. As the market goes soft, those presale agreements are dropped, deposits are forfeited, and lawsuits are filed."

Despite that worrisome trend, Witten estimates that nationwide, there are about 10 excess single-family homes for every condo.

"I would say its on the magnitude of just under 1 million more empty single-families on the ground today than the nation would normally have, and it's 100,000 to 150,000 units for condos," Witten said.

We need a big place

One factor that could cushion the influx of homes and condos onto rental markets is that construction of multifamily rental housing declined in many areas during the housing boom. Witten said 2007 could mark a 14-year low in new apartment starts nationwide.

Another bit of good news for some accidental landlords in markets hit hard by foreclosures is that when families lose their homes, they're not looking for a studio apartment, Latham said. Many will want to move to a three-bedroom apartment, home or condo.

"We are just starting to see if those are the units in greatest demand, and where units are going up the most," Latham said.

According to the latest Census Bureau data on housing vacancies and home ownership, single-unit buildings such as homes and condos had a lower vacancy rate -- 9.4 percent at the end of September -- than buildings with multiple units. Buildings with five to nine units had the highest vacancy rate, 10.9 percent, compared with a 10.2 vacancy rate for buildings with 10 or more units.

The Census Bureau reports that the more rooms a rental had, the more likely it was to be occupied during the third quarter. Units with one or two rooms had the highest vacancy rates -- 20.5 percent -- and those with six or more rooms the lowest, 7.6 percent.

Rent per square foot has been "of special interest" to people thinking about renting out condos, Latham said, because condos tend to be larger than most rentals.

"Let's say a one-bedroom unit in a rental building might be 650 square feet, but a condo might be 1,000 square feet," Latham said. Condo owners want to know, "How much more can we get because it's a bigger unit with additional amenities?"

ApartmentRating.com founder Jeremy Bencken said a survey of the site's users found "the vast majority of renters -- people who are ostensibly apartment hunting -- are interested in (renting) houses and condos."

Witten, however, questions whether condos and single-family homes are more desirable to renters than apartments.

"The reality is that professionally managed apartments have lots of amenities, and if something goes wrong, you know where to go to get it fixed," Witten said. "That's an advantage to the rental sector."

Another difficulty of marketing a condo or home that the owner intends to put up for sale when market conditions improve is that many renters are looking for long-term accommodations.

A final consideration in setting rent is the time of year a home goes on the market. Don't get discouraged -- or assume you've set the rent too high -- if you put a property up for rent at the end of the year and there are no takers.

October and November are "the worst time of the year" to market rental properties, said Robert Massey Jr., founder of RentalHouses.com and vice president of industry development at Primedia's Rentals.com.

When Massey was a full-time property manager, prospective clients would approach him around that time about renting out a property they were having trouble selling.

"I'd often be contacted late in the year, because it's a slow market for sales," Massey said. "Well, guess what? The rental market follows the same pattern. The reality is, the house will sit vacant longer than if it comes to me in April."

Up next: Part three of a three-part series on "accidental landlords" provides an overview of software and Web sites for marketing and managing rental properties.

***